Engage Operators in Preventing Equipment Failure
Operator driven reliability is a proactive approach to equipment reliability that gives frontline operators a defined role in maintaining basic equipment conditions, identifying abnormalities, and escalating emerging issues before they lead to equipment failure or production loss.
Operators interact with production assets every day. They often see, hear, feel, or experience changes in equipment performance before those changes become significant failures. An effective Operator Driven Reliability program turns that frontline knowledge into a structured reliability process.
Implementation Engineers works directly with operations and maintenance teams to implement the standards, operator care routines, inspection processes, escalation protocols, training, and management systems required to make equipment reliability a shared responsibility.
Define what operators are responsible for—and what remains with maintenance.
IE establishes clear operator responsibilities for basic equipment care, inspection, cleaning, lubrication where appropriate, startup and shutdown procedures, and other routine activities that help maintain equipment conditions.
Standard work gives operators clear expectations for what to inspect, what good operating condition looks like, and when intervention is required. These activities form the foundation of an effective operator care program.
Turn routine equipment interaction into early problem detection.
IE develops and implements operator preventive maintenance and inspection routines based on equipment requirements and asset strategies.
Operator PMs can be integrated into the organization’s CMMS/EAM so tasks are generated, completed, documented, and tracked rather than relying on informal checks.
Help operators recognize problems before they become failures.
Operators need to know what conditions require attention and what to do when they identify them. IE establishes abnormality identification and escalation processes so issues such as unusual vibration, temperature, noise, leaks, contamination, wear, or declining performance are consistently identified and communicated.
Clear escalation guidelines help ensure that abnormalities become actionable maintenance information rather than tribal knowledge.
Protect equipment during everyday operation.
Reliability isn’t only affected by maintenance. How equipment is started, operated, changed over, shut down, cleaned, and restarted can significantly affect asset condition.
IE develops and implements operating standards and procedures that reduce equipment-induced variation and establish consistent practices for protecting assets during normal operation.
Build capability at the point of execution.
A procedure alone doesn’t change behavior. IE trains operators on new and existing equipment-care procedures and reinforces those practices through frontline coaching, observation, and auditing.
The objective is not simply completing training. It is establishing consistent reliability behaviors as part of everyday operations.
Give operations and maintenance a common process for eliminating recurring issues.
Operator knowledge can also be incorporated into structured problem-solving activities such as Root Cause Corrective Action (RCCA) and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA).
Reliability Shouldn’t Be a Maintenance-Only Responsibility
In a reactive environment, operators run equipment until something goes wrong and maintenance is called to repair it. Maintenance becomes responsible for reliability while operations is primarily responsible for production.
That separation can allow small equipment abnormalities to go undetected or unresolved until they become larger failures.
Operator Driven Reliability creates a different operating model. Operators become an active first line of defense for equipment health, while skilled maintenance resources can focus more of their time on planned, preventive, predictive, and higher-value technical work.
The approach supports frontline equipment reliability by giving operators a clear role in identifying and addressing early signs of equipment problems.
The goal isn’t to transfer maintenance work to operators. It is to create shared ownership of equipment reliability.

A leading North American baked-goods manufacturer was experiencing significant unplanned maintenance and unreliable manufacturing equipment, disrupting production and limiting resource efficiency.
As part of a broader Asset Performance Excellence transformation, IE implemented Operator Driven Reliability to engage production operators in the day-to-day care and early identification of equipment issues. The program established clear operator responsibilities and integrated operator activities into the site’s broader maintenance and reliability system.
Operator driven reliability is a proactive maintenance and reliability approach that gives frontline operators a defined role in basic equipment care, inspections, abnormality detection, and escalation. It helps identify equipment issues early so maintenance teams can address problems before they result in failure or production loss.
ODR and autonomous maintenance have similar goals but are not always the same. Both involve operators taking a more active role in equipment care and early problem detection. Autonomous maintenance is often associated with Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and gives operators defined routine maintenance responsibilities, while ODR can be implemented as part of a broader reliability system based on the organization’s specific needs.
Operators can perform basic equipment care and routine activities such as cleaning, inspection, lubrication where appropriate, startup and shutdown checks, condition checks, and identification of abnormalities. The specific responsibilities should be clearly defined based on equipment requirements, safety considerations, operator capability, and site standards.
Operator equipment inspections help identify early signs of problems such as unusual noise, vibration, temperature changes, leaks, contamination, wear, or declining performance. When these abnormalities are documented and escalated through a defined reliability process, maintenance teams can investigate and correct issues before they develop into larger equipment failures.